Proceedings before BFA, BVwG and VwGH
The course and the chain of instances from the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum via the Federal Administrative Court to an extraordinary appeal to the VwGH.
Place your proceedings: which stage are you at?
From the Federal Office through the Federal Administrative Court to the supreme courts, each stage has its own rules and deadlines. Answer a few questions for an initial assessment.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Which stage are your proceedings at?
Overview of all answers.
Appeal to the Federal Administrative Court
Proceedings at the Federal Administrative Court
Revision or complaint to the supreme courts
Immigration proceedings follow a clear chain of instances. At the start stands the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA) as the first instance. Against its decision the appeal lies to the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG), and against the latter ruling an extraordinary appeal to the Administrative Court (VwGH) comes into consideration.
Anyone who knows the chain of instances can preserve deadlines and bring arguments at the right point. We accompany you across all stages and ensure that no procedural error brings the case down.
First instance: the BFA
The BFA conducts the investigative procedure, grants the right to be heard and issues the decision on the return decision, entry ban or residence ban. The course is already set here: a careful statement and complete evidence in the administrative procedure make every later appeal easier.
Second instance: the Federal Administrative Court
Against the decision of the BFA the BVwG decides on the appeal, regularly after an oral hearing. The court examines the facts and the law in full and may confirm, amend or set aside the decision.
- appeal within four weeks of service of the decision
- examination of the facts and the legal questions by the court
- regularly an oral hearing with examination of the parties
- ruling: confirmation, amendment or setting aside
Third stage: the appeal to the VwGH
Against the ruling of the BVwG an extraordinary appeal to the Administrative Court is possible. It must be filed within six weeks and is only admissible where a legal question of fundamental importance is involved. The VwGH no longer examines facts, but the correct application of the law.
How we support you
- representation already in the administrative procedure before the BFA
- filing and reasoning the appeal to the BVwG
- preparation for and attendance at the oral hearing
- examination and drafting of an extraordinary appeal to the VwGH
This article provides a general overview of Austrian law and does not replace advice in an individual case. The specific circumstances of your proceedings are always decisive.
What clients often ask.
How is the chain of instances in immigration law structured? +
What does the Federal Administrative Court examine? +
When is an appeal to the VwGH admissible? +
Which deadlines must I observe in the chain of instances? +
This may also be relevant to you.
Lifting or shortening an entry ban
Application to lift or shorten an entry ban under section 60 FPG: timely departure, changed circumstances and the right reasoning towards the BFA.
Residence ban and return decision
Return decisions against third-country nationals and residence bans against EU citizens under sections 52 and 67 FPG, with their different standards.
Schengen-wide entry ban and SIS alert
How an entry ban takes effect across the whole Schengen area through the Schengen Information System (SIS), its present legal basis in the EU SIS Regulations and the consultation procedure.
Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000