Secure the documents first.
Secure the decision, annexes, proof of service and all authority letters. Without complete documents, review remains uncertain.
Proceedings
Cost reimbursement under section 113 FPG after enforcement measures
Section 113 FPG may concern cost reimbursement for enforcement measures, detention, removal steps and interpretation costs.
Your contact person
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
19 August 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law
Cost reimbursement under section 113 FPG is a separate consequence in immigration enforcement. It is not about attorney fees, but about possible costs arising from measures such as detention, removal measures or interpretation.
Many people focus on the entry ban, appeal or departure. Later, a cost issue may arise that depends on enforcement and the file.
This article treats section 113 FPG as its own review point and distinguishes it from legal aid, appeal costs and general legal protection.
Assess your situation
Which question comes first?
Answer one short question. The result shows whether documents, deadlines or legal review should be prioritised.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
What is most urgent in your situation?
This does not replace legal advice, but helps with first orientation.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Deadlines take priority.
If a deadline or appointment is running, service should be checked immediately. Substantive arguments only help if they are raised in time.
The decision needs concrete review.
Whether a step makes sense depends on wording, reasons, evidence and the current procedural stage.
Assessment
Cost reimbursement is not the same as appeal costs
The strategy depends on identifying the type of cost at issue.
| Cost issue | Focus | Review |
|---|---|---|
| Section 113 FPG reimbursement | consequences of certain enforcement measures | decision, measure, amount, legal basis |
| Appeal and legal aid | legal protection against decisions | distinguish from costs, legal aid and legal protection |
| Detention or less coercive measure | interference and alternative | link to detention and entry ban and less coercive measure instead of detention |
First identify the concrete measure
First identify the concrete measure
For cost reimbursement, the measure actually taken matters. Detention, removal measures, less coercive measures or interpretation costs may be classified differently.
The authority must show what the claim is based on. Without a decision, payment request or file content, the cost issue cannot be assessed responsibly.
Timing also matters: which measure occurred when, who ordered it and which documents support it?
Keep legal protection and cost consequences separate
Keep legal protection and cost consequences separate
An appeal against an entry ban or detention does not automatically answer every later cost issue. Sometimes the cost decision must be read separately.
Conversely, the lawfulness of the measure may matter for reimbursement. Enforcement act, reasons and possible remedies should therefore be considered together.
Concrete amounts should not be assessed from instinct. Documents, statutory basis and transparent calculation are decisive.
Process
Reviewing a cost claim
- 01Documents01Documents
Secure decision or payment request
Written basis is needed for reliable review.
- 02Measure02Measure
Identify the enforcement measure
Separate detention, removal and interpretation.
- 03File03File
Check proof and calculation
Amount and basis must be traceable.
- 04Response04Response
Clarify deadline and objections
Do not wait for reminders.
Practice point: For section 113 FPG cost reimbursement, payment request, decision, file note and proof of the enforcement measure should be reviewed together. Paying without review can make later objections harder.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions on cost reimbursement under section 113 FPG.
Is this about attorney fees? +
No. This article concerns authority cost reimbursement under the FPG, not concrete law firm fees or fee agreements.
Can I challenge a cost claim? +
That depends on decision, deadline, measure and reasons. The documents should be reviewed quickly.
Must interpretation costs always be reimbursed? +
Not as a general rule. It depends on the legal basis relied on by the authority and how the costs are documented in the file.
Topics
Cost reimbursementDetentionRemoval measuresFPG
Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000