Prepare an appeal
A good appeal is complete, on time and factually reasoned. This checklist organises what matters in the preparation.
Anyone who wants to challenge a return decision, an entry ban or a residence ban files an appeal with the Federal Administrative Court. What is decisive is meeting the deadline, a complete statement of reasons and comprehensible evidence. The balancing between the public interest and private and family life under Article 8 ECHR is often at the centre.
This checklist is a guide and not a prognosis of success. Whether an appeal succeeds depends on the individual case and the specific file. The list helps you to organise the preparation and not to overlook anything essential.
Work through the points before filing the appeal. You can tick off each point; the status is saved on your device.
0 of 15 points done
01 Formalities and deadline
An appeal not rarely fails on formal errors or on the deadline.
02 Private and family life (Article 8 ECHR)
Personal ties are often the core of the balancing.
03 Employment and self-sufficiency
A secure economic position affects the balancing.
04 Danger assessment and reasoning
The authority’s assumption should be met factually and with evidence.
What matters legally
An appeal against a decision of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum is directed to the Federal Administrative Court. It must be filed in time and reasoned sufficiently. If the suspensive effect was excluded, it must be examined separately whether a corresponding application is made.
The balancing under Article 8 ECHR is often central; in immigration law it applies in particular through section 9 BFA-VG. Among other things, the duration of the stay, family ties, the degree of integration and the ties to the country of origin are taken into account. The duration of an entry ban is governed by section 53 FPG.
These notes do not replace an assessment of the individual case. Which arguments and evidence carry weight in the specific proceedings depends on the file.
This checklist is a general guide to the Austrian legal position (as of June 2026) and makes no claim to completeness or legal certainty. It does not replace advice in the individual case, is not a finished legal document and not a prognosis of success.
Related topics and tools
Family and private life (Article 8 ECHR)
The topic page on the balancing between the public interest and personal ties.
Proceedings before BFA, BVwG and VwGH
How the proceedings unfold and which instances play a role.
Deadline calculator
Arithmetic guidance on the appeal deadline after a decision has been served.
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000