Secure the documents first.
Secure the decision, annexes, proof of service and all authority letters. Without complete documents, review remains uncertain.
Return decision
Information duties after a return decision under section 58 FPG
Section 58 FPG concerns information after a return decision. Language, forms, service and deadlines must be checked.
Your contact person
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
18 August 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law
Information duties under section 58 FPG are more than a form attached to a decision. The person concerned must be able to understand what the return decision, duty to leave and possible enforcement steps mean in practice.
In entry-ban matters, the discussion often moves too quickly to deadlines. Before that, information, language, service and the file should be checked together.
This article complements the existing pieces on interpretation, legal advice and service. It focuses on the authority’s information after the return decision.
Assess your situation
Which question comes first?
Answer one short question. The result shows whether documents, deadlines or legal review should be prioritised.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
What is most urgent in your situation?
This does not replace legal advice, but helps with first orientation.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Deadlines take priority.
If a deadline or appointment is running, service should be checked immediately. Substantive arguments only help if they are raised in time.
The decision needs concrete review.
Whether a step makes sense depends on wording, reasons, evidence and the current procedural stage.
Assessment
How section 58 FPG differs from neighbouring issues
Several procedural safeguards interact, but each has a different function.
| Issue | Function | Typical review |
|---|---|---|
| Section 58 FPG information | make departure duty and enforcement understandable | form, language, handover, file note |
| Interpretation and translation | secure understanding of the procedure | compare with interpretation and translation |
| Legal advice | classify legal options | distinguish from legal advice in BFA proceedings |
Forms and understandable language matter
Forms and understandable language matter
The file should show which information was given. A form helps only if it fits the situation and is understandable.
For the person concerned, the practical question is what must be done now: organise departure, secure deadlines, keep the address current and collect documents.
Unclear language can become relevant if the authority later claims that duties were knowingly ignored.
Do not merge information, service and deadlines
Do not merge information, service and deadlines
service abroad determines when a decision becomes known and when deadlines may begin. The information duty concerns what the authority must explain.
A wrong appeal instruction may create an additional problem. Therefore information sheet, decision and appeal instruction should be read together.
Looking only at one date can miss whether the person actually received and understood the authority’s information.
Process
Review after a return decision
- 01Documents01Documents
Secure decision and annexes
Forms and proof of service also matter.
- 02Language02Language
Clarify understandability
Interpretation and translation are reviewed separately.
- 03Duties03Duties
Organise departure and cooperation
The file should show what was required.
- 04Remedy04Remedy
Set deadline and strategy
Uncertainty is no substitute for immediate review.
Practice point: For section 58 FPG, secure not only the decision but every annex. Missing forms or unclear language can become important later.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions on information duties under section 58 FPG.
Must the authority explain the return decision? +
The authority has information duties. Whether they were met depends on the decision, annexes, language and file content.
Is a standard form always enough? +
Not automatically. It matters whether the information was understandable in the specific situation.
Does unclear information stop the appeal deadline? +
Do not rely on that. Deadlines must be checked immediately based on service and the appeal instruction.
Topics
Information dutiesReturn decisionDepartureFPG
Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000